LUBBEN SOCIAL NETWORK SCALE PDF

Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6). The LSNS-6 is a validated instrument designed to gauge social isolation in older adults by measuring the number and . The Lubben Social Network Scale–6 (LSNS-6) is a six-item, self-reported scale to assess social isolation in older adults (aged 65 years old and. Description, The Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS) is a item instrument that was designed to measure social isolation in older adults by measuring.

Author: Taular Nizragore
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 2 July 2011
Pages: 270
PDF File Size: 14.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.80 Mb
ISBN: 780-6-93877-820-3
Downloads: 71478
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Doramar

There have been socil attempts to compare acale results of self-reported social network assessments with the assessment of social isolation by social workers in clinical settings e. Compared with these individuals, Hamburg respondents reported a greater incidence of poor self-perceived health, IADL difficulties, mental health problems, and health care utilization.

The total scale score is an equally weighted sum of the six items, with scores ranging from 0 to Finally, we used statistical methods for determining whether using an alternate cut point would have given better results.

A pproximately minutes.

The three items dealing with family all load heavily on that factor, and the three nonkin items also load heavily on the nonkin factor.

More work in this area is needed. Screening older persons based on the LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation who might benefit from in-depth assessment sale targeted interventions.

Although all three sites have a majority of residents belonging to a Christian church, the religious orientation differs between ,ubben three sites. Sociological and policy perspectives. Another item asks how often someone shows love and affection to the respondent, and the third item asks how often the respondent has someone to share worries with.

Correlations of rotated factor loading among the three sites gave us the opportunity to examine factor invariance. Again, this concern is tempered by data from another lubbben study.

  HERMLE C800U PDF

Lubben Social Network Scale

In addition to more research, gerontologists and other health care workers should also respond to the growing body of knowledge regarding the centrality of social ties to health and well-being of older adults. They also recounted that various researchers had developed abbreviated but inconsistent versions of the original LSNS.

These prevalence rates are higher than the rates expected in these populations. Such improved knowledge will enhance future gerontological research and geriatric care. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. How many relatives do you see or hear from at least once a month?

Social networks and social exclusion: Comparisons among the three sites are based on an analysis of variance for continuous variables and on a chi-square test for dichotomous variables. Our central focus in this study was to assess a recently reported abbreviated social network scale.

Lubben Social Network Scale–Revised (LSNS-R)

Additional data presented also were highly supportive of its discriminant validity. Among all three samples, the LSNS-6 and two subscales Family and Friends demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, stable factor structures, and high correlations with criterion variables.

Geriatric practice protocols to regularly monitor the social integration of older adult clientele have to be adopted. There is a need for valid and reliable short scales that can be used to assess social networks and social supports and to screen for social isolation in older persons.

The LSNS-6 Family subscale and the LSNS-6 Friends subscale similarly demonstrated strong discriminate validity in terms of the measures of living with a partner, participating in group activities, and receiving emotional support.

It demonstrated highly desirable measurement traits among three European older adult populations.

We decided to focus on the concept of lack of redundancy in social ties as the key criterion for determining a cut point for identifying individuals at risk for social isolation. One instrument that has been widely used to assess social integration and to screen for social isolation among community-dwelling populations is the Lubben Social Network Scale LSNS. Central to this research will be measurement development. LSNS-R is available for free at http: Among all three samples, the LSNS-6 and two subscales Family and Friends demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, stable factor structures, and high correlations with criterion variables.

  EL VICIO DE LA LECTURA EDITH WHARTON PDF

It has been associated with a wide array of health indicators. A clinical cut-point score of less than 12 on the LSNS-6 indicates that, on average, the respondent had fewer than two people to perform the particular social integration functions assessed by the LSNS It is noteworthy that this consistency was found even though there were relevant differences among the three samples in terms of demographic and health characteristics.

Thus, using this alternate approach, we found that a cut point of 12 seemed to be a cut point that could be justified by netwokr and practical considerations. A final contribution of the present zcale was to suggest clinical cut points for the LSNS-6 and the two subscales.

These data show that some information is lost as a result of the dichotomization of the scores. Based on the concept of lack of redundancy of social ties we defined clinical cut-points of the LSNS-6 for identifying persons deemed at risk for social isolation. The following limitation should be taken into account when the overall LSNS-6 score or the suggested clinical cut point is used. The Hamburg individuals consistently reported worse health status than did the individuals at the other two sites.

Self-administered questionnaire with health professionals as informants.

There were other major differences between the three sites.